Thursday, 2 April 2020

Guidance on "Virtual" Communion


Virtual Communion in the URC?

Some of our people wonder whether we can celebrate Holy Communion online. The person presiding would be linked by video or audio connection to others. Each participant would have bread and wine (or a suitable equivalent) ready beside them as they tuned in. When the time came to eat and drink, all would do so at the same time.

Is this communion, and may we do it? Here are a few thoughts:

  1. It may not be the most inclusive kind of worship, if it leaves out some people who would like to be there but lack the technical skills or kit to connect.

  1. It’s not the most ecumenical kind of worship, and those who belong to LEPs may want to be careful about the reservations of other Churches. Neither the Methodist Church nor the Church of England, for example, would recognise a communion of this kind. So in LEP situations, please ensure that you consult ecumenical partners first. If the decision is to go ahead, make clear that this is a URC communion to which ecumenical guests are welcome. Be aware that such guests may wish to observe and not partake of physical elements, in line with their differing but profoundly held understanding of communion.

  1. With these qualifications, our advice to the URC is that our tradition could in principle affirm the practice of online communion, as an appropriate pastoral provision in these exceptional times.

4.      In our tradition communion is thought of as a visual enactment of the Gospel. The reception of the elements signals our response to its promises. We certainly are willing to preach the Gospel online, and communion is one way that we do this for and with one another.

5.      It is important that the words of institution are read (1 Corinthians 11:23-26, or parallel verses in one of the gospels). There ought also to be clear presenting and receiving of the elements, and a firm affirmation that we share the feast as Christian community. If audio only is used, try to help the worshippers to visualise the sacramental actions – ‘we take, we break, we share …’ – before they receive themselves.

6.      The person presiding ought to be someone who could normally preside in the congregation concerned – a minister of word and sacraments, or another person authorised by the synod.

7.      What about the theology? A positive point comes from Calvin, that communion brings earthly people into the presence of the heavenly Christ: ‘What, then, our mind does not comprehend, let faith conceive: that the Spirit truly unites things separated in space.’ If the Spirit can do this for us with Jesus, the Spirit can surely unite us with one another in a virtual sharing of this sacrament.

8.      All the above would suggest that for us virtual communion is a reasonable interim measure, if we can handle the practicalities well and include people helpfully. If we do it well, it will both remind us of times when we could share at the Lord’s table and point forward to times when we shall do so again. In this – remembering and looking forward – it will reflect the character of every communion service, which remembers the Last Supper and looks forward in hope ‘until he come’. Communion is a sacrament for the time in-between, between the earthly life of Jesus and his coming in glory. As it turns distance into presence, so in these strange days it may turn isolation into companionship, and in places of anxiety and detachment it will quicken and renew our faith.

                              Alan Spence                       Convenor, Faith and Order Committee
                              Philip Brooks                     Secretary, Faith and Order Committee
                              John Proctor                      General Secretary                                                31 March 2020 

HOWEVER, if you are part of a Local Ecumenical Partnership (LEP) involving the Church of England or the Methodist Church, please note that these churches do not permit 'virtual' Communion, and that ought to be made clear to your congregation. I have had some helpfully explanatory comments from a Methodist colleague:

"The Conference reviewed this a few years ago, and as part of the response stated that “The Lord’s Supper is a sacrament of the Church, celebrated corporately by the people of God with an authorised president, and the physical gathering of Christians (normally around the Lord’s table) is an essential feature of its corporate celebration.” Given that at present we are not able to gather physically at one table, we are not able to share in this sacrament. 

It has also been suggested that our current deprivation of communion can be seen as a prophetic expression of the deprivation being felt by our nation, as we are isolated from one another. When the church gathers at table we express both our unity with one another and with Christ. Until we can do that once again, we cannot realise that unity and we therefore suffer the deprivation of communion as a consequence.

One of the challenges as well as joys of an LEP is the diversity of understandings and working out of our faith that we all have, including in the celebration of the eucharist."

If you do offer 'virtual' for those who wish to partake from such an LEP context, please avoid using any Anglican or Methodist liturgy.

An Anglican colleague suggests that an alternative could be a form of 'Agape'.

SPIRITUAL COMMUNION 

Another possibility is what is called 'spiritual communion'. If you want to know more about this, there is an excellent explanation, and accompanying resource, on the relevant page of the Diocese of Chelmsford's website - https://www.chelmsford.anglican.org/spiritual-communion

Paul Whittle, Synod Moderator, 7 April 2020, updated 23 April 2020


No comments:

Post a Comment