Do we need to
hold a Church Meeting?
During the
early period of ‘lockdown’ the following advice was given by the Clerk to
Assembly.
“Frequency of
meetings of councils of the church In view of the emerging government
advice, my advice is that the requirement for frequency of meetings be regarded
as suspended, for instance if it is not safe for a Church Meeting to meet the
minimum of quarterly, it should not do so.”
Alongside
this, there was advice to think around what sorts of decisions should be
taken by whom during the current situation - for instance if there was a
relatively urgent matter that would normally go to a church meeting, it might
be that the elders, meeting electronically, would have to make that decision.
It was also seen as important that there should be a clear record in their
minutes both the decision and the rationale for having made it at
that ‘level’. This is to ensure that should there
be questions as to the validity of a decision in the future, there is a
clear paper trail.
As lockdown
has continued, and video conferencing has become part of far
more people’s lives, there have been moves to increase participation
in decision making through holding virtual meetings of the councils
of the church. At an Assembly level there are papers (which are
necessarily rather long and complex) at https://urc.org.uk/images/MissionCouncil/July2020/Resolutions_32_and_33.pdf
In the
same way as a church might have more decisions being taken by the eldership,
rather than the church meeting, much of the business of Assembly was dealt with by Mission Council, which is a smaller body. However,
there are issues which will simply have to wait, because they are of such
fundamental importance, or complexity. Whilst that may not seem altogether
relevant on a local level, the same principles apply for a congregation.
It is also
recognised that the way in which we meet may disenfranchise particular
groups. This has always been the case - for example an evening meeting
might leave parents with young children unable to attend. A daytime
meeting may exclude those in full time work… The potential to meet
electronically will include some, but exclude others, particularly some of our
older members (though not all of them by any means) who may not be ‘tech
savvy’, or may for other reasons not be able to get online. If meetings
are to happen virtually, it’s important to consider what viewpoints might not
be heard.
It’s also
important to recognise that whilst video conferencing is a helpful
tool it has some severe limitations, especially in that discernment
process that we call ‘finding the mind of Christ in the Councils of
the Church"
There is no
absolute answer to questions of whether Church Meetings should be held, or
postponed at this stage – it will depend on the context – but here are a few
points to think about:
•
what decisions are urgent? Can they reasonably be dealt with
by elders?
•
what decisions are of such importance that they need to be
dealt with by the whole church?
•
can those decisions be taken without a physical meeting?
•
how many people could access a virtual meeting? what groups
might be excluded?
•
how do we record decisions about what is dealt with by elders
rather than church during this period, in case anyone queries them later.
No comments:
Post a Comment